So @Purism happened to use wordfence which happened to block my tor exit node
@ghost 先不说向群众推广。
根据我微博的观察,国内的科技专业从业者,哪怕是泛 ACG 圈的新一代,对这些议题态度也通常分类三类:
要么是当顺民:欢迎政府监控我!我完全希望放弃虚无的自由换取实在的安全!
要么投降主义:我们的世界终归是要被政府和财团控制的,无论做什么都只能延缓这个过程。我们什么都做不了。(这还是国内著名的网络安全教主)
要么是 indifference:资本都是邪恶的,都是只看利益的。因此,任何公司的任何产品都没什么区别,好用就用,不好用就不用。
如果他们依然主导话语权,那就没戏。
Someone brought up a really good point about headphone jacks. I want to clarify that I'm not demeaning the criticism of their removal. I think it's yet another disgusting aspect of the widespread exercise of control and a massive security fail.
My audio peripherals got no fucking business accessing a port or wireless protocol that can send actual data instead of audio-only signal. Fuck off with that shit. People WILL be keylogged because of this.
Give creators 100 years of copyright, and corporations will require that it be assigned to them for the full duration as a condition of publication.
@leo_song 想起之前辩论信息安全问题的一段对话。
?:……所以这个方案的固件安全问题十分严重。
我:你在硬件上装个跳线不就行了?不接跳线,软件无法以任何方式修改固件。
?:一旦遇到 Evil Maid Attack,女仆一来,你这安全措施有什么用?
我:连物理跳线都挡不住攻击者,要这么说的话,女仆还会用热风枪换芯片、插上个 Bad-PCI-e、安装键盘记录器、偷取 Master Key、恶搞内核!女仆是最强的!这种偏执的威胁模型下,还谈何防御?!
?:女仆又不是马猴烧酒。女仆的时间明明是有限的,好嘛!
我:问题是,如果这位女仆是十六夜咲夜呢?
I'm not saying it's relevant to me, but an interesting trend in tech to observed anyway -
New iPhone, higher screen resolution, faster CPU, larger battery capacity, bigger Flash storage, etc, while still coming with the same 5-watt charger just like those they made in 2008, unbelievable! Somehow, for some reasons, something will never change...
Oops, there has been some change, now with state-of-art DRM!
RT @github@twitter.com: EU developers, don't let THIS happen to you. Tell your MEPs to protect software when they vote on Wednesday.
Learn more 👉https://blog.github.com/2018-09-10-how-developers-can-defend-open-source-from-the-eu-copyright-proposal
海の底で独りぼっちになる